Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> Hyperbole aside, it isn't a joke. Looking at the chain we see a common
> problem where subversion relies on java-11-openjdk and without it is going
> to cause a lot of packages to be removed. Either subversion needs to lose
> that requirement or a lot of packages are going to get removed as failure
> to build in i686.
>
> libglvnd-glx<-mesa-libGL<-libxcb<-doxygen<-git<-subversion<-java-11-
openjdk-devel
>
> This email isn't a comment about it being a good or bad thing.. it is just
> what is being presented.
I do not see why bogus "bug" reports are filed against a bazillion packages
when subversion is the only package that needs to be fixed.
File a bug against subversion, put it on the release blocker tracker, and do
not waste everyone else's time.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
