On 06. 07. 22 1:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 06. 07. 22 0:14, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
Hyperbole aside, it isn't a joke. Looking at the chain we see a common
problem where subversion relies on java-11-openjdk and without it is going
to cause a lot of packages to be removed. Either subversion needs to lose
that requirement or a lot of packages are going to get removed as failure
to build in i686.
libglvnd-glx<-mesa-libGL<-libxcb<-doxygen<-git<-subversion<-java-11-
openjdk-devel
This email isn't a comment about it being a good or bad thing.. it is just
what is being presented.
I do not see why bogus "bug" reports are filed against a bazillion packages
when subversion is the only package that needs to be fixed.
File a bug against subversion, put it on the release blocker tracker, and do
not waste everyone else's time.
Jiri, could you please close all the bugzillas that were only opened due to the
subversion<-java dependency now when
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103909 was fixed?
I've closed some bugs for very important components manualy, but there are
simply too many.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
