Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> said: > The biggest one for me is that offline updating - `dnf offline-upgrade` > - still isn't implemented on dnf5. But I've run into quite a lot of > smaller 'paper cuts', like `dnf history info <packagename>` doesn't > work...just today I found that installing an older kernel doesn't work > (older dnf does this just fine)...there are quite a lot of these at > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues .
I recently ran into a bug with dnf where reposync and repomanage don't agree on what "new" means, filed a bug against RHEL 9 (where I ran into it), and the response was that it wouldn't be fixed but it would be kept in mind when developing that functionality for dnf5. So from that, and a quick look at the dnf5 packages in F38, I guess neither has been implemented yet. I use that in several places to keep local copies of repos, so that missing is a problem for me. -- Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
