On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:23 AM Jaroslav Mracek <jmra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:40 AM Jaroslav Mracek <jmracek(a)redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > Except dnf5 broke a number of microdnf usecases with low memory where > > microdnf worked [1]. > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2214520 > > Correct but as you can see the issue was not in DNF5 but in libsolv (solver > for DNF, DNF5, zypper, PackageKit). Ales Matej from DNF team prepared two > patches - one to resolve the issue in libsolv and second to enable workaround > for DNF5. Thanks to better DNF5 structure we were able to discover the real > cause of the issue.
Does that mean the issues with dnf [2] we able to be solved all the time but just weren't investigated? > Therefore I am curios why the issue is mentioned here? Because the issues, while quite probably now known, still aren't resolved in F-38 where it was meant to be stable for those usecases from the release of F-38. This in turn gives me little confidence in the rest of dnf5 being ready to replace the much larger set of usecases as implemented by dnf4 by the Change Completion [3] deadline in less than 3 weeks time. [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907030 [3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-39/f-39-key-tasks.html _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
