Vitaly Zaitsev via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2025-10-06 09:35:47: > On 06/10/2025 08:55, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > In my opinion, Fedora Flatpak maintainer could be a maintainer of the > > flatpak they build even if they install other RPM packages. This does > > not require them to be RPM package maintainers. > > Technically, yes. But if a maintainer wants to build the foo-bar > Flatpak, they first need to package it as an RPM if it's not available > in Fedora.
This is certainly true. Though at the moment, we do not lack RPM pachages. We do lack Fedora flatpaks built from RPMs if we want "Fedora flatpaks" to have any future at all. RPM -> flatpak is too difficult for existing packagers, and impossible for willing contributors who are not packagers. Cheers Michael -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
