This is not intended to be snarky, but I admit it could sound like it is. When
are long startup times for services considered to be bugs in their own right?
[root@f19q ~]# systemd-analyze blame
1min 444ms sm-client.service
1min 310ms sendmail.service
18.602s firewalld.service
13.882s avahi-daemon.service
12.944s NetworkManager-wait-online.service
12.715s restorecond.service
2.911s abrt-uefioops.service
2.792s NetworkManager.service
2.634s spice-vdagentd.service
2.589s iprinit.service
2.583s iprupdate.service
2.319s chronyd.service
10 seconds for a service seems obscene. 1 minute is so bad it's hilarious, but
also really annoying. I feel like filing a bug against anything that takes more
than 1/2 second but maybe that's being overly generous (by filing the bug, that
is).
In sendmail's defense, the time is about the same on F18. (It's consistently a
bit faster in an F19 VM running on the same F18 system as host.)
But firewalld goes from 7 seconds to 18 seconds? Why? avahi-daemon,
restorecond, all are an order of magnitude longer on F19 than F18. It's a 3+
minute userspace hit on the startup time where the kernel takes 1.9 seconds.
Off hand this doesn't seem reasonable, especially sendmail. If the time can't
be brought down by a lot, can it ship disabled by default?
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
