On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 15:51 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > This is not intended to be snarky, but I admit it could sound like it is. > When are long startup times for services considered to be bugs in their own > right? > > > [root@f19q ~]# systemd-analyze blame > 1min 444ms sm-client.service > 1min 310ms sendmail.service > 18.602s firewalld.service > 13.882s avahi-daemon.service > 12.944s NetworkManager-wait-online.service > 12.715s restorecond.service > 2.911s abrt-uefioops.service > 2.792s NetworkManager.service > 2.634s spice-vdagentd.service > 2.589s iprinit.service > 2.583s iprupdate.service > 2.319s chronyd.service > > > 10 seconds for a service seems obscene. 1 minute is so bad it's hilarious, > but also really annoying. I feel like filing a bug against anything that > takes more than 1/2 second but maybe that's being overly generous (by filing > the bug, that is). > > In sendmail's defense, the time is about the same on F18. (It's consistently > a bit faster in an F19 VM running on the same F18 system as host.) > > But firewalld goes from 7 seconds to 18 seconds? Why? avahi-daemon, > restorecond, all are an order of magnitude longer on F19 than F18. It's a 3+ > minute userspace hit on the startup time where the kernel takes 1.9 seconds. > Off hand this doesn't seem reasonable, especially sendmail. If the time can't > be brought down by a lot, can it ship disabled by default? > > > Chris Murphy See this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962038 Can you provide from console hostnamectl ?
-- Best Regards, Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
