Hey, what about `ipc_stack` due to its utilization of the former? But still: I'm still not convinced of the reason to give it a name. All operating systems have a default stack but no one is bound to use it and can use their `ultra` stack etc. (in Linux e.g. as a library). The naming of uIP is mainly historic, since it started out as a seperate project. As far as I know TinyOS' stack has no name either.
Cheers, Martine 2015-05-12 13:02 GMT+02:00 Kaspar Schleiser <kas...@schleiser.de>: > Hey, > > On 05/12/2015 09:54 AM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > >> I just stumbled across ng_netconf - we should rename this to avoid >> confusion >> with RFC 6241 [1]. If the stack would have a name, we could simply call it >> <NAME>_conf... >> > > If "nameless" sticks, we could just replace all "ng_" with "nl_" ... Until > we port libnl, of course. > > Kaspar > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@riot-os.org > https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
