Hi, On 05/03/15 14:52, Martine Lenders wrote: >> Perfect. Still, what do we refer to when talking about "this new tack"? >> "the default stack"? > > Yes. The problem here is that the interfaces someone uses will imply the implementation.
For example, if someone includes "net/udp.h", after dropping the "ng_" prefix, you get the "default stack" udp include file. IMHO that file should include a stack agnostic interface whose implementation is selected by e.g., USEMODULE. Same for all other developer-accessible protocols. I'm happy with having a default network stack. I'm not happy if that stack's specific interface ends up as de-facto standard interface, making switching stacks practically impossible. Kaspar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
