On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:10:42 +0200 Thomas Winischhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B> Alan Hourihane wrote:
(B> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:27:13PM +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
(B> >
(B> >>Would I be correct in the assumption that the only accelerated path for
(B> >xrender>is the identity transform (1:1 scale)? all other transforms are done
(B> >in>software? (my initial tests here with xfree86 4.3.0 & nvidia's latest
(B> >drivers>(as of about a month ago) seem to indicate as much...) (and yes... my
(B> >drivers>are using acceleration... GL definitely is). ?
(B> >
(B> >
(B> > No. About 99% of the drivers don't have any xrender acceleration. I think
(B> > only the mga driver does. Although looking furthur the sis has some, but
(B> > it seems disabled,
(B>
(B> It's disabled because it doesn't work as Render. SiS hardware only
(B> supports one alpha per operation (and not per pixel). I kept the code
(B> within "#if 0"s for possibly upcoming XAA transparency support.
(B
(Byou're kidding? no alpha pixels? that's pretty poor in this day & age for gfx
(Bhware... hmmm..
(B
(B
(B
(B--
(B--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$B7'<*(B - $Bhttp://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
