On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:28:13PM -0400, Joe Krahn wrote:
>I've discussed XINPUT before, tried to fix some things, and
>realized that the XFree86 XINPUT code needs a complete re-write.
>It is particularly messed up for non-pointer devices. Jim
>Gettys took over XFree86 XINPUT, and agreed that a re-write
>is needed. I put off working on XINPUT until he got started,
>because he knows much more about X than me. I've been busy
>doing other things, so I don't know what the recent progress
>is in updating XINPUT.

As a general rule it's usually not a good idea to use the possibility
that someone else might be working on something as a reason to
delay starting on it yourself.  Unless, that is, you're in the loop
with what is happening.  I got caught out on this myself regarding
functionality simliar to RandR a couple of years ago :-(.

I'm not aware of anyone currently working on a rewrite of the X
Input extension for XFree86.  Now would be a good time for someone
who is to speak up.  Otherwise the discussions here should continue
with the goal of solidifying how a new version of the input extension
for XFree86 should look.

David
--
David Dawes
Founder/committer/developer                     The XFree86 Project
www.XFree86.org/~dawes
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to