The meaning of "trivial" is indeed price-based, but I think it's a lot higher than £5k. Iirc, it's sth like €500k, but my memory could be making that up…
2009/12/7 Nick Leaton <[email protected]> > The question, what's trivial. > > My view is that it should be set at something like 5K. > > Now that might mean its 'expensive' to put on line. However, if there is a > standard, then there aren't that many software providers to government. > > With a standard, it doesn't take many suppliers to implement the standard, > for it to be available. > > Nick > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Alexander Harrowell <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> On Monday 07 December 2009 12:48:38 Nick Leaton wrote: >> >> > The really interesting bit is missing. All contracts, and all costs >> should >> >> > be online. That would really shake things up. >> >> > >> >> > Contracts are straightforward since they are text. >> >> > >> >> > Costs need some sort of simple XML to publish. Given a spec for what is >> >> > needed, it makes it easier to ask for it to be produced. >> >> > >> >> > Nick >> >> All nontrivial contracts have to be written out in the Official Journal of >> the EU, which I think is online somewhere... >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list [email protected] >> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: >> >> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public >> > > > > -- > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list [email protected] > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
