Hi Matthew,  

There was no perfect way to describe the exact situation in one sentence. It 
may be oversimplified as we mailed it to thousands of people, but it is not 
misleading: the Postcode Address File (PAF, aka "the postcode dataset") is not 
open.


--  
Javier Ruiz
[email protected]
+44(0)7877 911 412
@javierruiz
www.OpenRightsGroup.org
Winners of Liberty's Human Rights Campaigner of the Year Award 2012


On Monday, 4 February 2013 at 15:27, Matthew Somerville wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> It looks like the original post is about the full address dataset (ie. all 
> the delivery addresses within a postcode), not just the postcodes themselves. 
> It does have a misleading subject line and call to action, in that case, as 
> the postcodes are definitely already "opened up" - postcode data is already 
> freely available under the OS Open Data licence, as you say.
>  
> ATB,
> Matthew
>  
> On 4 Feb 2013, at 14:15, Matt Robinson wrote:
> > Just to play devil's advocate here, what's wrong with the free Ordnance 
> > Survey API (other than its inscrutable JSON responses)? I can imagine that 
> > it will be held up defensively by any ministers contacted by this campaign.
> >  
> > http://data.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/doc/postcodeunit/SO164GU
> >  
> > Is it that it's:
> > • too incomplete (it doesn't resolve to a street name, just lat/long, 
> > country, district and ward),  
> > • not authoritative (as in, Royal Mail is the original source of post 
> > codes),  
> > • not downloadable,  
> > • or that the Open Government License it's released under is insufficiently 
> > open?  
> > • Something else?  
> > I used it commercially and non-commercially to provide lat/long lookup for 
> > postcodes. It's been pretty good.
> >  
> > Secondly, "The Royal Mail can’t be allowed to exploit this information for 
> > commercial gain" is pretty contentious (I'm not sure that's intentional). I 
> > think it would be better to argue that Royal Mail shouldn't be able to 
> > withhold this data. After all why shouldn't Royal Mail build profitable (or 
> > at least self-sustaining) services on top of open data? We'll certainly be 
> > trying to!  
> >  
> > --
> > Matt Robinson
> > https://lazycat.org/
> >  
> > On 4 Feb 2013, at 13:22, Owen Blacker <[email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote:
> >  
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Javier Ruiz <[email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])>
> > > Date: 4 February 2013 13:06
> > > Subject: [Okfn-en] Help open up the postcode dataset
> > > To: "[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])" 
> > > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
> > >  
> > > […]
> > > Data about UK addresses is still locked down, unavailable to the general 
> > > public and only accessible with an expensive and complex annual license 
> > > from the Royal Mail. Innovators are being discouraged from putting this 
> > > core reference data to creative use. British businesses and public 
> > > services have to cope with the unnecessary burden of applying and paying 
> > > for access to location data.
> > >  
> > > The Open Data Users Group, a governmental advisory group, has just 
> > > released a report calling for a public and open National Address Dataset 
> > > to replace the restrictive database that we have now.
> > > […]
> > > Location data is a critical national asset. The Royal Mail can’t be 
> > > allowed to exploit this information for commercial gain. Instead, the 
> > > government should make this data freely available as part of our national 
> > > public infrastructure.
> > >  
> > > Ministers will try to hide behind the argument that these issues only 
> > > concern a minority of technical experts. This just isn’t true. We need 
> > > your help to show them that British citizens are well aware of the 
> > > crucial importance of this data and are ready to be vocal about it.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> developers-public mailing list
> [email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
>  
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/javier%40openrightsgroup.org
>   

_______________________________________________
developers-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public

Unsubscribe: 
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/options/developers-public/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to