On 01/13/2012 02:10 PM, ext Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > (...) > Surely startRequest() would have been a better name. > But really not sure it is worth the hassle of changing it. > Still Robins suggestions shows a practical approach.
I don't really think it is worth changing it, I think for 5.0 so far we only broke source compatibility if the name or signature was plain wrong (8ef86d05f199ebab216da43d5e0a9dc322b657b3 or bf7f17060773803f332e8c729a70f47b94243890), not in cases where it could have been named better... Peter > > Ciao, > Mathias > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development