On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Peter Kümmel <syntheti...@gmx.net> wrote: > But to think first about what "createRequest" really does is a good idea: > It not only creates a request, it also sends it, so why not rename it to > 'doRequest' or something similar which is different to 'createReply' > which is as misleading as 'createRequest'. > > A new name would stop the compiler and there will be no silent bugs. > And replacing a simple function name isn't that hard, so there is no > need for a 'migration path' via deprecated functions.
There would still be silent errors for people who have reimplemented the createRequest method (it's virtual). I think this was covered earlier in this thread. Cheers Rich. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development