QFtp, QHttp are ported as standalone classes in a kitchen sink repo on my hard 
drive.
Once there is a project on gerrit, I can push it for code review.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture....@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture....@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 15:01
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qftp removal
>
> On Wednesday, 11 de January de 2012 14.48.55, lars.kn...@nokia.com
> wrote:
> > Yes, please. We need a name for it. How about qtnetwork4 ?
> >
> > I people are ok with the name, can you add the repo, Sergio?
> >
> > Who'd be willing to import the code and examples into that repo?
> Shane?
>
> I'd say we should keep each independent class in its own static library
> build.
> So it would be "qftp" inside a kitchen sink repository.
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
>      Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
>      Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden

________________________________
Subject to local law, communications with Accenture and its affiliates 
including telephone calls and emails (including content), may be monitored by 
our systems for the purposes of security and the assessment of internal 
compliance with Accenture policy.
______________________________________________________________________________________

www.accenture.com

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to