It may not be trivial, but it's the workflow we have defined for promoting a playground module to an official add-on. Would it be any more complex than creating a new project (initialised with the contents of the previous project repo, rather than empty) and deleting the old project?
And we've created projects with pre-existing git history before, when importing the Qt5 modules to gerrit. > -----Original Message----- > From: development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture....@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+shane.kearns=accenture....@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen > Sent: 28 March 2012 17:56 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qftp removal > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:17:36PM +0000, ext > shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote: > > If there are other Qt4 classes that would benefit from this approach, > we can rename the repo later. > > > well, no, we cannot (without major hassle) - gerrit doesn't support > renaming. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development ________________________________ Subject to local law, communications with Accenture and its affiliates including telephone calls and emails (including content), may be monitored by our systems for the purposes of security and the assessment of internal compliance with Accenture policy. ______________________________________________________________________________________ www.accenture.com _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
