On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 09:04 +0300, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Hello all > > I think that, despite the potential benefits of the changes, we should not > apply them at this time. There are far too many chances for breakage and it's > a blatant disrespect for the feature freeze. > > The changes are public, though, so we can always retrieve them for Qt 6 when > we do it in (say) 4 years time.
I don't know the changes in detail, but would it be possible to introduce the container changes under a special namespace instead (think std::tr1)? Then we could still choose to use them in new code and the transition to Qt 6 would be somewhat easier. regards, Michael _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
