On segunda-feira, 16 de julho de 2012 21.34.10, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:04:39AM +0300, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > I think that, despite the potential benefits of the changes, we
> > should not apply them at this time. There are far too many chances
> > for breakage and it's a blatant disrespect for the feature freeze.
>
> I assume this is meant as a verdict, not as (possibly temporary)
> state of thinking.

Correct. The changes are the right thing to do, just not now. We'll have to
live with the current containers and their overhead until Qt 6.

That includes the fact that QList<QVariant> is extremely inefficient.

--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to