On Tuesday July 17 2012, Andre Somers wrote: > Op 16-7-2012 23:52, Thiago Macieira schreef: [...] > > That includes the fact that QList<QVariant> is extremely inefficient. > > That being the case, would it be possible to at least document these > issues properly then? I think it is not all that clear from the > documentation that QList is so inefficient for these cases. I don't > think documentation changes are binary incompatible ;-) [...]
Would a patch that makes certain QList instantiations privately inherit QVector acceptable? I'm thinking QList<QModelIndex>, QList<QVariant>, mostly, probably others. That would require a patch that made QList and QVector identical, API-wise, and that, in turn, would require "using member;" support in the compiler (the QT_NO_USING define is still in the code). Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
