On quinta-feira, 5 de julho de 2012 11.28.58, Michael Hasselmann wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 09:04 +0300, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Hello all > > > > I think that, despite the potential benefits of the changes, we should not > > apply them at this time. There are far too many chances for breakage and > > it's a blatant disrespect for the feature freeze. > > > > The changes are public, though, so we can always retrieve them for Qt 6 > > when we do it in (say) 4 years time. > > I don't know the changes in detail, but would it be possible to > introduce the container changes under a special namespace instead (think > std::tr1)? > > Then we could still choose to use them in new code and the transition to > Qt 6 would be somewhat easier.
We can add them, but I don't see a value in doing that if no one is using
them. They'll just increase build time.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
