On jueves, 16 de junio de 2016 10:06:45 A. M. ART Kevin Funk wrote: [snip] > I'd like to hear more opinions about whether there's still interest in > having it in Qt proper. There are obviously advantages to it: CI coverage > (qt- solutions.git isn't covered by CI, right?), and QtSA getting a bit of > exposure so it does not feel like a, well, 3rdparty Qt solution.
+1. It used to be packaged in qt-solutions in Debian (and thus Ubuntu), but I would really love to see this part of Qt proper non the less. -- #exclude <windows.h> Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
