> I’d say Qt Core. This should not really require a large addition to it.
Do you mean QtSingleApplication or QtSolutions to QtCore?
Because then QtSingleApplication should be removed from QtQtSolutions,
as it will be in QtCore... :)
And, what about QtService from QtSolutions ?
BR,
Denis
16.06.2016 22:23, Lars Knoll пишет:
On 16/06/16 20:47, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira"
<development-bounces+lars.knoll=qt...@qt-project.org on behalf of
thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote:
On quinta-feira, 16 de junho de 2016 20:03:09 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
+1, it should be promoted to add-on at least.
As I said, I'd welcome it in QtCore, but a separate module is fine too.
I’d say Qt Core. This should not really require a large addition to it.
I've been wondering whether QtCore needs to be split in Qt 6. It's grown too
big. At least the animation framework and state machine should move out,
possibly the item models too.
It most certainly should. But how exactly is something we’ll need to discuss a
bit more.
I'd like to move XML out too, but that would require moving MIME types out.
MIME types would be one of my primary candidates to move out. But we should
consider removing the dependency of mimetypes onto XML in any case, by moving
the conversion from XML to binary database into a compile step.
Cheers,
Lars
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
