| contribs.org is simply providing a central place with information | about the (future) development. All this information is for 'free' and
| everybody can contribute and share this information. >>Then why has the discussion been taken private? It hardly seems to be a good way to start off, particularly >>when you'll want the support of the people being excluded. Does this show what we can expect in the future? Frankly, I wonder as well... I think I understand the devteam having a need to be involved in all the necessities of making this project a go... But, maybe they don't see the perspective that has been presented from an 'outside' view. Much discussion about useful, productive needs was happening and we all 'saw' it occuring. Now, it 'appears' to have turned inward..?? Let me preface my next comment by saying I have no reason not to have every respect and trust in the group that is emerging... Yet, I have no interest in a project that may turn into a 'closed-group' project with motives unknown. IMHO, 'we' cannot project that impression at the onset of this project. We can only get where we want to go as long as 'we' are together in the process :-) [snip-from-contribs.org]The list was created to discuss operational as well as deveopmental issues, and as such, needs to be low volume.[/end-snip] I am sorry, but the above statement, coupled with the fact that the list is now private, 'feels' like a shift in... Something? Craig Jensen -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
