At Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:46:57 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > I am skeptical that you could fit 20 nodes on a 20W system; that's using > what, a low-end laptop processor?
If you'd like to, I can do a real test till new year. I use an ITX board with an ATI embedded thingy (I can dig for the specs at home - wantd to blog about it anyway). Main feature: 8GiB memory. I use it throttled at 2x800MHz, normally it would be 2x1.6GHz. No fan, 64GiB SSD-storage. > > Darn, 10.000€ is just what the BKA (german central police) spends yearly to > > surveill skype… > > > > So they could easily afford making every second freenet node a police-node. > We need some source of scarcity that is expensive for an attacker but cheap > for a normal user. Unfortunately it does not exist. Yes. We don't have an asymmetric source as in crypto when we use opennet. We can only get that through darknet. > > And I just saw that simple relation: You need 1€ per year to run a freenet > > node, plus an initial investment of 10€ - maybe less if you purchase in > > high > > quantity. > Right. And I'm skeptical about "millions of users" even being enough, because > a big target attracts more funding. Well,skype has millions of users with sensitive information, but the company canonly charge 10.000 a year. If they could charge more, I'm sure they would :) > Having said that, I think it should be possible to make it rather expensive > to trace inserts, at a moderate performance cost. That would be pretty nice :) Best wishes, Arne _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
