On 08/02/2013 08:22 AM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Friday 02 Aug 2013 02:00:59 xor wrote: > [snip] >>>> In that case, I should probably implement >>>> "GetIdentitiesByPartialNickname". >>> >>> That would be very useful not only for this project but also for >>> anything that wants to have autocomplete. (Such as Freemail >>> recipients in the "to" field of the web interface.) >> >> Fine. Then I get your point now. Now the question is: When should I >> implement it? >> >> The next point on my roadmap is getting event-notifications in a >> merge-able state. This probably will take a full month. I had >> already delayed event-notifications for a month due to other work. >> Implementing GetIdentitiesByPartialNickname take a full week or >> even two. It would have to be done in a proper way to be persistent >> and use the database. >> >> How easy is it for you to work without this feature right now? Can >> you use a dummy-implementation until I finish event-notifications? >> >> Event-notifications would also be useful for you maybe to deliver >> pull-requests by solving a captcha of the person who shall receive >> the pull request. >> >> Toad, what do you think? >> > I'd bounce this back to operhiem1. Does p0s working on this in the > relatively near future save you a lot of work? If not, it should be > postponed until after event notifications.
I see no need to prioritize working on this in the near future. WoT-integrated Infocalypse features still work without GetIdentitiesByPartialNickname. It falls back to GetIdentity, which means for non-local identities the entire identity ID must be specified. This removes the convenience of partial matching, but it does still function.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
