On 02/11/15 21:57, Bob Ham wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 08:15 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: > >> I feel like you're belitting what work we do because we have not >> performed it in accordance with an overarching strategy. > I'm not trying to belittle anyone, I'm simply pointing out that there is > a problem in how the project is going about achieving its goals. Or > not, as the case may be. > >> I do have ideas for workflows I'd like to see Freenet >> support, and can go into them if you'd consider that enough to be a >> strategy. > *Facepalm* > > Why are you concerned about what *I* consider to be a strategy? Why > aren't you yourself concerned about making a plan for the project to > achieve its goals? > > I wonder, is there an underlying problem that nobody cares enough? > >> Do you have any suggestions to make? > Be extremely clear in what you want to achieve as a group and then set > out how you intend to achieve that. > > At present there are some fairly specific but high-level goals outlined > on the website. Unfortunately, there is no plan at all on how to > achieve those goals. > > I can't suggest how you might go about determining what you want to > achieve and how to do it because I don't know how the group works > together. That is, how it communicates or comes to a consensus. > > Again I wonder, is there an underlying problem in that the group > *doesn't* work together? Aren't all volunteer projects necessarily coalitions of people with differing goals? I mean, how much front-most leadership and strategy is actually possible?
Doesn't mean we shouldn't try. We have lots of disorganised masses of goals, e.g. the bug tracker. Trying to organise them is a good thing...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
