Am Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2015, 22:59:19 schrieb [email protected]: > A centralized model of authority servers run by trusted project > members is the way to go.
This would be dumb, because it would turn us into central points of failure. > Freenet users have to trust you to not backdoor the program. This is wrong, since users can check the code and test whether the code release corresponds to the binary release with the verify-build scripts: https://github.com/freenet/scripts/blob/master/verify-build > Darknet is private not anonymous and lacks the quality of data > availability after the publisher is offline. This is wrong. The rest of your message does not get better so I won’t spend more time on it. Your message here shows clearly, however, that when we’re wasting time on rehashing discussions of things which we already found to be contraproductive, we’re giving ammunition to people who want to disrupt Freenet development. I agree with Ximin here. I answered the three most glaring misinformations in the message to avoid others stumbling over them. I should blog about them. For all who don’t understand what Ximin means with psy-ops: http://draketo.de/english/freenet/de-orchestrating-phk Best wishes, Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
