Ian Clarke writes: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 2:32 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide [email protected] > > This is very much necessary. Without checking what can actually be found
^ very relevant line you removed > > and what cannot, using the poll to support decisions is a mere fraud. > > Now that you've accused me of fraud Notice that I did not. I told you that if you were to use the results without checking what they can actually say, that would be fraud. Like using an uncalibrated meter to sell wares. You used the process without checking what it can actually say? Then you were sloppy and people let you get away with it. For uncontroversial decisions, no problem with that. But the decision we’re talking about is controversial. There were large scale conflicts about it and there’s a split in the userbase. Therefore I’m trying to make sure that the process is ironclad. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [email protected] https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
