On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 10:29 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.de wrote:I’m trying to make sure that the process is ironclad.
scale conflicts about it and there’s a split in the userbase. Therefore But the decision we’re talking about is controversial. There were large You used the process without checking what it can actually say? Then you were sloppy and people let you get away with it. For uncontroversial decisions, no problem with that. I was not sloppy, the problem of strategic voting that you're so concerned about was discussed in my original proposal, as a reminder: A few important things here to ensure we get the true benefit of “wisdom of the crowd”: * Don’t be strategic (eg. don’t over-allocate to one area because you assume others might under-allocate to it) * Don’t collude * Don’t consider difficulty in your value allocation * If you aren’t sure, leave stuff at an even allocation, don’t assign 0 value All you seem capable of doing is criticizing from the sidelines, demoralizing people like Xor that are actually trying to move things forward. Whether it's refusing to use Google Docs because I was mean to you off-list on an unrelated matter, or now whether you're complaining about a problem that was discussed in my original proposal as if it's some kind of oversight. Either find a way to be constructive, or stay out of it. Ian. Ian Clarke Founder, The Freenet Project Email: i...@freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
