-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > Well, since everyone else votes for Blowfish, I'll vote for Twofish, > since it's designed to address some of Blowfish's deficiencies and is > also seems to be a top contender for AES.
I just want to say that I have no problem w/ twofish either. Its design is very similar to blowfish, but with varying key lengths. > The same cipher as the inter-node cipher, obviously... > > Thoughts on key length? Is 128 enough? Is 384 too many? I'd go with > 128, offhand. We need speed for the inter-node cipher. I think 128 would be fine. We should go for 192 or 256 on data storage though. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE5CHuipXyM95IyRhURAqb1AKCWUM0s17D1BXCCRVMj2qTinRG6xwCgyllL tVAZcj1cgewgRk7rJzVpZmA= =Tm4T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
