> Yes, you are right. But to a large extent this is what we are discussing, for > internode it is possible to use negotiation and alike, but for data we are > stuck with the crypto we choose (we can add more with time using a > Storable.EncryptionCypher field of course).
Am I missing something, or is this not entirely a client issue with no bearing on the protocol or nodes at all? Yes, "Storable.Encryption" or something like it is a good way to implement this, and maybe we should recommend that; but the existing nodes do exactly the right thing already, which is nothing. -- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee at piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past, are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
