On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:47:34PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > > Am I missing something, or is this not entirely a client issue with > > no bearing on the protocol or nodes at all? Yes, "Storable.Encryption" > > or something like it is a good way to implement this, and maybe we > > should recommend that; but the existing nodes do exactly the right > > thing already, which is nothing. > > Yes, that is true. But we develop clients here too, and even more importantly > client standards. >
What if a client *doesn't* encrypt it? Anyone could upload something nasty to your server and it wouldn't be encrypted. Kindof defeats the point doesn't it? AGL -- Whenever anyone says, "theoretically," they really mean, "not really." _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
