Yes, you are right. But to a large extent this is what we are discussing, for internode it is possible to use negotiation and alike, but for data we are stuck with the crypto we choose (we can add more with time using a Storable.EncryptionCypher field of course).
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Bill Trost wrote: > Incidentally, it seems to me that data encryption should have a higher > priority than link encryption (not that I'm stepping out to implement, > mind you). The easiest way to spy on Freenet traffic is to set up > a Freenet node. It's also easier for the client to "negotiate" the > encryption parameters. > > _______________________________________________ > Freenet-dev mailing list > Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev -- Oskar Sandberg md98-osa at nada.kth.se #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list Freenet-dev at lists.sourceforge.net http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
