> "Scott G. Miller" wrote: > > > Its better if we do not include a whole lot of suspicious looking > > "stealth" code in Freenet. > > Freenet already includes "suspicious looking stealth code". It encrypts > data and hides it. Yeah, but thats not "stealth". Thats merely good sense in a modern system. Any system not designed with encryption these days is either running on a trusted network, or naive.
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20000811/4cdb5f64/attachment.pgp>
