>>>>> "SR" == Stefan Reich <doc at drjava.de> writes:
SR> Hm, I don't know which scheme you have for the version
SR> numbering... But since the key index handling changes
SR> dramatically in the new version, wouldn't it be good to do a
SR> larger step? Say, 0.3.9?
No, actually, it's just a performance improvement. I don't believe
there's an interface change at all. 0.3.8.2 is going to be fine, I
think.
By the way, we don't usually like doing releases one on top of the
other, since it looks bad. You're getting a special exception because
you're so insistent. You better make this worthwhile.
~Mr. Bad
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mr. Bad <mr.bad at pigdog.org> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
freenet:MSK at SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
>From devl-admin at freenetproject.org Sat Apr 7 15:34:53 2001
Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org>
Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11])
by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA05894
