On Saturday 07 April 2001 20:40, you wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:39:17AM -0400, Mark J. Roberts wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Stefan Reich wrote: > > > Sure, that might happen... occasionally or regularly, who knows. But > > > since we don't know yet and have a lot of other things on the to-do > > > list (as you pointed out), we should just leave the system the way it > > > is for now. > > > > > > Or what's your suggestion? > > > > If I had a suggestion, I'd have put it forward. Publishing a new keypair > > daily is an effective way to limit the impact of a flood, but determined > > attackers will be undeterred. > > > > Are you comfortable implementing a system that won't survive a serious > > attack? > > Anyone want to try thinkcash... it might work. It'd be interesting > anyway. I think that it will work fine. I've been thinking about this ever since I read Ian's article on Half Empty...
I have written a prototype anonymous submission system that uses numbers in non-OCRable (I think) gifs as the think cash task. The server publishes an image of a long hex number in an enumerated SSK
