On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:54:16AM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > Changing the package name from Freenet has been brought up before. This > would be a good time to do that.
I still don't really see the point. If we had a domain like "freenet.org" then it would be nice to use the package org.freenet; convention, but org.freenetproject is too much of a mouthful. Can anyone give one good reason to change the package name that would outweigh the effort required to do it? Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian at freenetproject.org Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020101/1ce5a3cc/attachment.pgp>
