On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:54:16AM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:02:56PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > > The "Freenet" module in CVS is a mess right now. I suggest that we > > create a new "freenet" module with the following structure: > > > > freenet > > - src > > - Freenet > > [Sourcecode goes here] > > + classes > > [Compiled classes go here] > > + javadocs > > [Javadocs will go here] > > + Makefile > > + README > > + INSTALL > > > > Thoughts?
I don't like it at all. I like having the java code in it's own module so that I can check it out directly into my java tree - otherwise you have to mess with symlinks (I'm on a mission of finding whoever started the practice of setting the classpath variable explicitely for every single java package installed and removing their medulla oblongata through their eyesockets with a rusty hedgecutter). Also, I don't see the point of checking in compiled javadocs, and especially binary class files, into cvs. CVS is lousy as a FTP system - there are much better ways to make builds available. Keeping the class and java files in seperate directories is also very annoying if you want to keep one java software tree (please note: replying "set classpath to both dirs" may put your lower brainstem in danger of frontal extraction). > That looks reasonable. I'd rather you named the build dir "build" > instead of "classes", it is fairly standard. One java tree, one java tree, one java tree. > Changing the package name from Freenet has been brought up before. This > would be a good time to do that. This otoh is a good idea. It should be "freenet". > > -- > > :: tavin cole (tcole at espnow.com) :: > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
