On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 11:53:18AM +0100, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > Also, I don't see the point of checking in compiled javadocs, and > especially binary class files, into cvs. CVS is lousy as a FTP system - > there are much better ways to make builds available.
I assume he just meant those would be the directory names created by the make builds. > > That looks reasonable. I'd rather you named the build dir "build" > > instead of "classes", it is fairly standard. > > One java tree, one java tree, one java tree. Why? Mixing the .class files with the source files just gets in the way.. I like rm -r build/Freenet/ > > Changing the package name from Freenet has been brought up before. This > > would be a good time to do that. > > This otoh is a good idea. It should be "freenet". I tend to agree. -- :: tavin cole (tcole at espnow.com) :: _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
