On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:46:27PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: <> > I still don't really see the point. If we had a domain like > "freenet.org" then it would be nice to use the > > package org.freenet; > > convention, but org.freenetproject is too much of a mouthful.
The domain name conventions stinks - freenet transcends the DNS system, it is silly that we should name our software after it. "freenet" would be a nice package name. > Can anyone give one good reason to change the package name that would > outweigh the effort required to do it? The only effort is changing the module in cvs which you seem to want to do for worse reasons anyways. <> -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
