On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 10:02:16PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > Matthew wrote: > > I have no idea what you are talking about. > > Nodes that aren't worried about whoom they talk to can use destination > sampling (like old Freenet, but with forced specialization). If nodes use > this, it won't matter if they got in with some "matchmaking service".
So opennet... Fix the node specialization, never swap it, and connect to destination (with LRU). This will comfortably interface with darknet swapping? What about nodes which have both darknet and opennet references? The hybrid would be messy - half the network (well actually 1% of the network) has location swapping and fixed links, and the other half (99%) has fixed specialization and mobile links... and the nodes which are on both have a few fixed links, a swappable location, and many mobile links. This is sufficiently worrying that I'd have to see it simulated before implementing it. And my gut feeling is that it will be considerably more difficult in terms of load management and routing churn. > > // oskar -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060626/6543870e/attachment.pgp>
