> Even if DADVSI is passed, the case of Freenet remains debatable. In fact, > DADVSI says that it's forbidden to develop networks being explicitly designed > for illegal file sharing. As you can guess, this is stupid: How judges will > define if a network is designed for that or not ? It's even more true for > Freenet, as the main goal is the freedom of speech, and clearly not illegal > file sharing.
Thinking of it logically FileZilla client/server is more illegal then Freenet. -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki "None of us are free until all of us are free." ~ Mihail Bakunin
