On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 12:52:36PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Nicola Lugato wrote: > > Maybe some operation that are currently executing in parallel can be > > serialized on a single thread, or on a limited thread pool? > > Instead of each request/insert having its own thread, we could convert > requests/inserts into state machines and process them in the context of > the UDP receiver thread, with all outgoing packets being queued for > dispatch by the UDP sender thread. However, this would be a major change > - - are we sure that the large number of threads is what's causing > performance problems, or could it be public key crypto or something else > we can't avoid?
What is causing performance problems for most people is the lack of a good load limiting/balancing algorithm, low level problems, and assorted bugs. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060909/4c2bf13f/attachment.pgp>
