* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2008-12-15 23:10:57]:
> On Sunday 14 December 2008 12:48, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Zero3 <zero3 at zerosplayground.dk> wrote: > > > That covers mine, toads and nextgens opinions. What do everyone else > think? > > > > Here are my thoughts: > > > > Bundling > > ---------- > > I don't have a problem with bundling per-se provided we are judicious > > about what gets bundled. In issues like this I think its instructive > > to look at what other installers do and I think its pretty clear that > > bundling dependencies is the norm, not the exception. > > > > That being said, I don't have a big problem with downloading > > dependencies on-demand either. I don't think there is a big > > difference in the user experience in either case. > > > > So I could live with either solution. > > As I understand it, so could nextgens, as long as *the installers and the > jars > they contain are NOT BUILT ON EMU*. IMHO this isn't unreasonable, since they > would only have to be rebuilt when we release a new stable build, I have to > run a load of scripts at that point anyway. > > Am I misrepresenting/misunderstanding you nextgens? No, as you said, I can live with both solutions provided we don't build nor sign the installers on emu. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20081216/730d8301/attachment.pgp>
