On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Evan Daniel <evanbd at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Ian Clarke <ian at locut.us> wrote: >> Any chance of a graph? >> Ian. > > There's a graph that's a couple days old on my flog. ?I posted updated > graphs last night on IRC. ?I'm away from my own computer right now, so > I don't have the links handy. ?I'll reply with them later tonight, or > perhaps someone has their IRC log handy. > > Evan
My flog: freenet:USK at gjw6StjZOZ4OAG-pqOxIp5Nk11udQZOrozD4jld42Ac,BYyqgAtc9p0JGbJ~18XU6mtO9ChnBZdf~ttCn48FV7s,AQACAAE/flog/14/ Network size graph: freenet:CHK at jj4IUQ8g6Wq399iu3Wv8tWHzq4YhJarRQqGqhifMifY,D5t4hZY8y3jFHyvd080Y3w-KqO9q-XBTBZMedC2LKJ0,AAIC--8/network_size_20091201.png Network size graph with regression model: freenet:CHK at 6iY844s26aoOi~U-hp4o60jAC1C1m4GK6PZsjWdrAK0,R6ySmNvLz2~p-iTc~PVMpQ2KEqoDCc07xQ4wgat6drE,AAIC--8/network_size_modeled_20091201.png Instantaneous size data for graphs above: freenet:CHK at CEbirb~kmYrgXAX-veZFvADZXJxXFl0MdNfzJxLIjGY,RRnCLWsiN8jSPZsGKc-g3hE48qcw~ad4HJtxPnerXO8,AAIC--8/network_size_20091201.txt The model I fit has two parts: an average size, and a daily variation. The average size is a single-pole filtered step function (that is, flat up to a specific time, then exponentially decaying to a new (larger) value after that). This is the pink curve on the second graph. The daily variation is a sum of sine waves (periods 24, 12, 8, and 6 hours), which is used as a multiplier on the average size to produce the predicted network size (yellow curve). R^2 is 0.992. I'll give more details, spreadsheet, etc in a flog post tonight or tomorrow. Evan Daniel > >> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Evan Daniel <evanbd at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Ian Clarke <ian at locut.us> wrote: >>> > On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Ximin Luo <xl269 at cam.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> I wasn't suggesting taking legal action against the Guardian. Sorry if >>> >> that's >>> >> what "libel" implies - I'm not "in" with legal terminology. I was just >>> >> pointing >>> >> out that it's a very very very misleading caption; practically a lie. >>> > >>> > It certainly focuses on the negative to the exclusion of the positive, >>> > but >>> > regardless - I don't think it hurts us. ?I think most people are smart >>> > enough to know that if Freenet is safe enough for criminals then it must >>> > do >>> > what it claims to do! >>> > Sure enough, our traffic has increased dramatically since that article, >>> > primarily coming from people searching for "freenet" in search engines, >>> > so >>> > they are obviously reading the article and deciding to try it. ?Even >>> > today, >>> > several days later, our traffic is quite a bit higher than normal. >>> > Ian. >>> >>> The article appears to account for a near doubling in size of the >>> Freenet network, both in terms of nodes online at any one time and >>> total nodes seen, according to my tests. >>> >>> The network size growth has slowed dramatically since the article came >>> out, but it's still growing, and shows no signs of peaking. >>> >>> Evan Daniel >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devl mailing list >>> Devl at freenetproject.org >>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >> >> >> >> -- >> Ian Clarke >> CEO, Uprizer Labs >> Email: ian at uprizer.com >> Ph: +1 512 422 3588 >> >
