On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Ximin Luo <xl269 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> I wasn't suggesting taking legal action against the Guardian. Sorry if > that's > what "libel" implies - I'm not "in" with legal terminology. I was just > pointing > out that it's a very very very misleading caption; practically a lie. It certainly focuses on the negative to the exclusion of the positive, but regardless - I don't think it hurts us. I think most people are smart enough to know that if Freenet is safe enough for criminals then it must do what it claims to do! Sure enough, our traffic has increased dramatically since that article, primarily coming from people searching for "freenet" in search engines, so they are obviously reading the article and deciding to try it. Even today, several days later, our traffic is quite a bit higher than normal. Ian. -- Ian Clarke CEO, Uprizer Labs Email: ian at uprizer.com Ph: +1 512 422 3588 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091128/0aec35fb/attachment.html>
