On Thursday 14 May 2009 18:35:07 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Matthew Toseland schrieb: > > My observation: Can we get rid of the "I will configure it manually" choice? > > And maybe the welcome page? (#3094) > > You want to force everyone to use the Wizard?
Why would that be bad? > > > Because we were both on the same LAN, it did not connect, until I told him to > > set it to allow local addresses on that peer. There should be a checkbox when > > adding a noderef, defaulting to on, "Friend may be on the same local network > > as me" or something. (#3098) > > This is imho not usual, so i would set this to very low priority and only for advanced mode enabled. Hmmm, maybe. > > > Related idea: We should maybe tell the user in the installer that they should > > use a separate browser for Freenet, rather than in the wizard? And then let > > them choose one, and then use it when they click on the icon to browse > > Freenet? (#3104) > > This would produce additional work for people packaging freenet, since they would have to warn the > user themselves, while users tend to ignore the output of the package manager. > So this would lower the chance of people noticing the request for a different freenet > browser/profile and therefor i am against it. I suggest the current way: Warning during first call > of the webinterface like it is currently done. Well, maybe on linux, with the packages that we don't have yet... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090514/89bf31f6/attachment.pgp>
