On Saturday 13 February 2010 09:24:47 Romain Dalmaso wrote: > I have to admit, toad, I strongly agree with you. Maybe, instead of > rewriting FProxy completely, should we use a template engine for more > theming possibilities ?
We have discussed using templating engines in the past. The problem has generally been that they are rather humongous, would bloat the download by at least a megabyte and probably introduce a turing-complete language into what is supposed to be pure presentation. > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Evan Daniel <evanbd at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Ian Clarke <ian at locut.us> wrote: > > > Talk to any designer and ask > > > them if they can change a design through CSS alone and they'll think you > > are > > > joking, I promise. > > > > Perhaps many designers, but not all. There are some notable ones who > > disagree with you, and they offer some rather stunning evidence: > > http://www.csszengarden.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20100213/ee75410d/attachment.pgp>
