Nicolas Hernandez schrieb: > Hello Ian, > > We are still looking for the best choice between running in jetty > a. Accessibility for devs (nice eclipse plugin for example) > b. Accessibility for user > c. Light weight > d. Performance > > In our side the priority are like that a>b>d>c (+eclipse plugin) > Four some freenet devs it loks like c>d>a>b (+velocity for templating) > > Not so easy to make the good choice. We have three mains ideas > A- using Apache Wickets http://wicket.apache.org/ > B- gwt
I dont contribute code as a freenet dev, but i do package it for Gentoo linux and from that perspective, i have to strongly vote against gwt. That thing is a big beast with many included external libs, often even modified ones and a complex build system. I once tried to create a package for it, it took me many hours and there was still no good result. So unless this has greatly increased or someone else can provide a sane package for Gentoo, requiring this framework to build freenet would result in freenet being dropped from Gentoo as a package. -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 380 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20120307/70f20fba/attachment.pgp>
